Disclosure: Some of the links on this page are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, I will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase.



iSpeech.org

Is astrology reliable? Over the years, there have been evidences that show correlations between the events of cosmos and the events happening here on earth. But if astrology can influence these circumstances, then it should be susceptible to statistical study. Is astrology reliable? Various studies have been made, and one of which includes from Jung. The results of these studies appear to vindicate claims predicted through astrology. In 1950, a young statistician named, Michel Gauquelin set out to disprove such claims and arrived with unexpected results. In this article, you’ll discover is astrology reliable?

Is Astrology Reliable: Birthdates and Professions

Is astrology reliable? Using the modern methods in the 50s, Gauquelin was able to spot loop holes in the statistic. One by one, he was able to disprove the claims except for one. This exception was created by Leon Lasson, a French astrologer. Lasson maintained his claims when it comes to the correlation of the planets’ position at birth and the profession that the individual will later have in his life. The test groups employed by Lasson however were too small. It didn’t satisfy statistical standards but Gauquelin was able to set out and prove it anyway.

Is astrology reliable? Gauquelin compiled a statistically acceptable group of 576 people consisting of eminent professors of medicine. He also examined their horoscopes. To Gauquelin’s surprise, he discovered that both Saturn and Mars aspected created crucial points in the charts of the professors. It also has a frequency that exceeded chance. The odds against his data being chance were so many thousands to one that Gauquelin, being a natural numbers guy, couldn’t allow these results to rest.

Different Professions, Same Results

Over the next few years, Gauquelin collected the horoscopes of eminent men in several distinct professions. It includes men who are in the fields of politics, military, music, fine arts, journalism, medicine, clergy, sports and writing. In each case, Gauquelin was able to find out the premise of Lasson. Despite varying degrees of significance in the statistics, there were indeed correlations. It’s between the planets at the moment where a child was born and the profession that he/ she will later pursue.

Is astrology reliable? According to the data from Gauquelin’s research, it also showed that individual professions were also linked with specific planets. These correlations pave way for various discrepancies that supported time – honored astrological beliefs.

Mars and Saturn were prominent in the charts of men who are in medicine and those who are in academics, as any astrologer would have predicted. On the other hand, Jupiter and Mars were prominent in the horoscopes of those who are in sports and in the military.

Is Astrology Reliable: Expanding Studies

Is astrology reliable? Not that Gauquelin was converted to astrology through the evidence he gathered. But he claimed that he had discovered a brand new planetary influence that has nothing to do with the old belief of astrology. The study he conducted also did not stir interest among his colleagues. The experts also refused to examine his work. Eventually, the administrator of the French National Institute of Statistics named
M. Jean Porte, commented on his work.

Porte attacked Gauquelin’s work on a number of statistical details. His objection was that the young statistician confined his inquiry to just French people. According to Porte, what Gauquelin had done was just turn up a national fluke.

Repeat Experiment

And because of this, Gauquelin devoted the next few years to repeat his original experiment but this time he used data from other European countries. His original findings were confirmed. For instance, while Mars was important in the charts of Italian military men, it scarcely figured in the charts of German soldiers. An astrologer studying these results can perhaps content that it is because German soldiers are military – inclined to start with. This is why they don’t need a strong Mars to create soldiers, while the less violent Italians require more.

Proven and Tested

At this point, Gauquelin’s test group has become massive, and the odds against the results being chance stood at many millions to one. There have also been supporting arguments that eventually emerged. For instance, the horoscopes of control groups that were selected at random from the population regardless of their profession invariably showed the planets distributed at the level of chance.

M. Porte was now forced to admit that he was wrong, and that Gauquelin was right. The position of the planets at birth had an influence on the profession that the man will later pursue in life. This correlation was proven across nine distinct professions, and is now accepted as a fact.

Is Astrology Reliable: Planets and Heredity

Subsequent research by Gauquelin has resulted into incontestable evidence of the planet’s influence particularly in heredity. The planetary patterns in the charts of parents show up as well in the charts of their kids. This corroborates another ancient astrological belief. Unfortunately, Gauquelin’s research is still ignored by science today. And on rare occasions, it wins a mention in the press but it’s usually written in a distorted way.

Is Astrology Reliable: Structured Astrological Studies

Is astrology reliable? One important by – product of Gauquelin’s work has been to make astrologers realize the necessity of employing statistics and research. Through Gauquelin’s work, many statisticians have become quite interested in astrology. There is now various research that show planetary influences at work in different fields.

Conclusion

Donald Bradley, an American statistician and astrologer, showed an impressive between the phases of the moon and the rainfall. He also showed non – random factors that are at work in the birth dates of various American clergymen that he took from Who’s Who in America.

In Great Britain, John Addey, president of the British Astrological Association, repeated the experiment using the birthdates of British clergymen from Who’s Who as well. He also found the same non – random factors that can influence a particular aspect in their lives. Addey has also shown astrological factors that operate in over a thousand cases of life expectancy. This also includes the inclination to polio of over three thousand victims of the disease. We hope this article answer your question, is astrology reliable?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This